Poetry has never been one of my fortes. So when I found out we were supposed to write a
collection of poems, I knew I was done for.
I sat for hours just trying to think of
what to write about and then another few hours actually coming up with the words. It was a painfully long process. I started thinking of things that are important in life and that's how I came up with my first poem;
Freedom.
Now the title is pretty self-explanatory, this poem was about freedom. The title probably could've been better thought out, but unfortunately it was all I could think of. I made this poem about sound and instantly regretted it as I wracked my brain for rhyming words. I followed the structure to the best of my abilities by using the
a,b,a,b rhyming scheme and used a lot of metaphors and similies throughout the poem. Another poetry device I used was personification. I made Freedom into a character, saying things like: "Freedom was my friend, a companion to love." I believe that this poem does evoke a feeling of pain and sadness, which is what I was aiming for. To have something like freedom being taken away from you, it's not easy, and I feel like this poem shows how necessary freedom is by showing how unattainable it is for the character in the poem. I used very formal diction in order to get a sense of detachment and a "given up" feeling...which is kind of depressing. I guess my grammar and punctuation is consistent...I mean I don't really know. And the poem was appropriate length. I think the strength of this poem was the rhyming and rythm. Words like
replaced, embraced and
gone, dawn, really helped put the poem together. A weakness in my poem was most definitely that it wouldn't really make sense to the reader. They would understand it was about freedom but they wouldn't really get what happened to strip this character from it. While writing this, all I saw in my head was a guy in a prison cell, so I really couldn't answer what had happened to him; I didn't think that far.
All in all, I guess it was an okay poem.
My second poem was an image poem. I absolutely hated the title. I called it
Reality. As soon as I typed it in I hated it. But of course I couldn't think of something better until after I had handed it in. With this image poem I attempted to portray the struggles of suffering that some people have to go through. I really liked how this poem turned out, though it wasn't exactly as I hoped it would be. I used the constant repetition of the word "Imagine" in order to paint a picture in the reader's mind and I think it was quite effective. I really thought of cacophony here in order to make the readers realize the harshness and severity of the situation and I feel like that might have been a weakness because I tend to get carried away with stuff like that. I thought that the ending was the best part, though originally I had intended to get rid of it. Here it is: "The time has come, to come together, and make this reality something we could never imagine." I felt like this line evoked a strong sense of inspiration and a "do something" attitude which is what I was going for. The rest of the poem, like the first one, is quite depressing (which makes me realize that a lot of my poems are quite depressing…weird). Out of the entire collection, I think that this one was the best.

The first haiku,
Into the Light, was okay, I suppose. Like the others, I hated the title (I'm sensing a pattern here…), but I felt that the concept was intriguing. The idea of someone heading off into this supposed "light." Don't get me wrong, I believe in heaven, I'm just a little skeptical about this bright, white light. So I wrote about someone going into this light. I followed the 5, 7, 5 structure; though I was hoping Mr. Heneke wouldn't notice a dropped syllable here or there. I liked the use of my words here, for example, "A
small step forward," which kind of signifies the fear of the person as well as my skepticism about the light. A weakness of the poem was, in my opinion, the use of the title in the poem. It just kind of felt like I was repeating myself and it sounded kind of off. At least it wasn't as depressing as the other ones…even though the guy died.
I had had enough of my depressing poems so I practically forced myself to write a happy one. It was about love and I called it:
Smile, Love. I guess the title for this one was okay, could have been better but at the same time it could've been worse. A weakness of this poem was that it was a giant cliché. I mean you see it in books and movies. The guy or the girl smiles and their partner practically falls to their knees begging for attention. It may be a cliché, but it's still sweet. So I guess a strength was that it was different, out of my comfort zone and not depressing. I followed the structure and it was an appropriate length. It wasn't my favourite, but I was glad that I tried something different.
Bolt of Light was my final haiku. This one was more like a typical haiku because it was connected to nature, a storm in particular. Following the structure was easy; however, the poem did not turn out at all as I had wanted it to. It didn't make sense at all which was also the biggest weakness. This one was definitely not the best.
I liked my last poem;
Queen of Hearts (I actually liked the title too! Surprised?)
. I thought it would be interesting to think like the Queen from
Alice in Wonderland. I believe that I was able to portray her well, cruel, easily annoyed and restless. In my poem I show the Queen commanding her guard to behead a creature but I didn't explain why or what he did in order to deserve that. That would be my weakness. This was a character poem and I believe I was able to portray, with the right words, the personality of the Queen. For example, my favourite part of the poem is as follows: "I smirked at the creature before me, inferior in every way, before turning to the guards, with my own expectant gaze. "You know the drill," I said, "OFF WITH HIS HEAD."" I believe I portrayed her well especially by using her "catchphrase."